Cancel
Comment on Fundamentals of an Aesthetic discovery

gamma Tue, Sep 8, 2009
Wildcat, I wouldn't consider noise as Failure as it can be deliberately made. If you're talking about noise in audio you can adjust it and tweak different frequencies to produce a specific kind of noise in a controlled environment, such as white noise, pink noise and so on.


What would Mandelbrot say about the noise in the signal? It never ends when you zoom in like a Cantor dust. How about stochastic resonance?, in case certain brain process functions only with background noise?


gamma Thanks for the extended info, the way I presented Failure in the post is totally as a fundamental dynamic perceived and created by/in the human mind. I guess my next question would be: could this be distilled in some form of equation? and if so, could it be proven by the use of that equation?


I am only accidentally handling the topic of brain, for which I have no qualification. Equations are perhaps ahead of what you wrote. First on top of my mind is a book from Mishimori, application of Ising model to associative memories. That would be for examples of patterns, states, attractors...

Within one simulation, one pattern could emerge or submerge like an image in your mind - any memory perhaps. Next step. Your post falls into the category where you recognize that "failure" is an "image", but you understand the nature of "failure image" with the background in dynamics.

Did anyone write in the past about elements in awareness interpreted using dynamics?, yes, but did they write about direct, personal insight and handling of elements in awareness as if you are personally witnessing Attractors, Repellents and such as if your brain is a simulation of dynamics and a manifestation screen of the state space? maybe. I do not really know, it could be ordinary stuff at some college or near-ordinary, I can't really find out.