CoCreatrSun, Sep 12, 2010 Thank you, Ben. Indeed you showed me bizarre — as scientific. I only showed bizarre as primitive art and bow in admiration. What would there be that is not bizarre?
The fact that truth transcends theoremhood , in any given formal system, is called "incompleteness" of that system .
Douglas R. Hofstadter: Gödel, Escher, Bach (1999) p. 86
Which is essentially proof that you are right. It seems we both agree that reductionist science only goes so far. How about a few more steps of progress using holistic approaches as advocated by Monica Anderson and others. Are there others? Who?
Thank you, Ben. Indeed you showed me bizarre — as scientific. I only showed bizarre as primitive art and bow in admiration. What would there be that is not bizarre?
Which is essentially proof that you are right. It seems we both agree that reductionist science only goes so far. How about a few more steps of progress using holistic approaches as advocated by Monica Anderson and others. Are there others? Who?