Member 2336
6 entries

Alex (M, 32)
New York, US
Immortal since Oct 7, 2009
Uplinks: 0, Generation 2

  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • HelloAlexCL’s favorites
    3D Mandelbrot Set
    From Spaceweaver
    A perspective of ~absolute...
    From Ronald Frederick
    TEDx Amsterdam 2009 Wubbo...
    From alborz
    Reading Borges Reading
    From HazardousDavis
    Do schools KILL creativity?
    Recently commented on
    "Only the madman is...
    Great Expectations
    From weather
    the unconditional reality
    From jay
    altered states (1980)
    From Olena
    Who was phone?
    HelloAlexCL’s projects
    Start your own revolution
    Catching up with the future. All major institutions in the world today are grappling to come to terms with the internet. The entertainment...

    What happened to nature?
    How to stay in touch with our biological origins in a world devoid of nature? The majestic nature that once inspired poets, painters and...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From HelloAlexCL's personal cargo

    what is consciousness? OR what is the sameness in all moments of experience?
    In order to identify the sameness of all instances of x – to distinguish the common thread that runs through - one would naturally, often unconsciously, identify how x differs from non-x. This would at least provide a dualistic understanding of the sameness of x. When x = experience, however, this dualistic method of understanding does not suffice: in fact, it falls flat on its face. I am forced to abandon this method of understanding that is so familiar and with which I am comfortable, for I cannot “step out” of experience, and even if I lived in some strange universe where I could, I could not experience non-experience, as this itself would be an experience. In other words, non-experience is impossible because it could not be experienced [as such].

    Non-experience cannot exist outside of experience, that is, it cannot exist independently of experience. Non-experience is the most unfathomable concept imaginable, yet experience penetrates it, [turning it into itself and thereby] negating it as non-experience, as independently existent. (If experience penetrates non-experience, we can say securely, in case we couldn’t earlier, that experience is capable of penetrating anything.) In its subsumption, experience negates the independently existent. Experience is thus emptiness, which is interdependence, and emptiness is experience. Coming full circle…the sameness in every moment of experience is that it is experience! Excuse the tautology. In other words, experience, or consciousness, does not possess any inherent form. It is capable of taking any form imaginable - literally. Keep dreaming, futurist friends.

    Sun, Nov 22, 2009  Permanent link

      RSS for this post
    Add comment
      Add to favorites
    Synapses (1)