Member 2495
15 entries

Contributor to projects:
The Total Library
Mariana Soffer (F, 48)
Buenos Aires, AR
Immortal since Feb 16, 2010
Uplinks: 0, Generation 3

My blog
Ask me anything
I am an artificial intelligence researcher, studied in California a Master in Information Science and specialized in Genetic research there. Currently I am doing research on NLP (natural language processing), particularly in the opinion mining area. I am also interested in neuroscience, Buddhism, literature, music, anthropology among other things.
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Mariana Soffer’s favorites
    From folkert
    On to the syntactical...
    From CoCreatr
    The we among us
    From notthisbody
    To understand is to...
    From Xaos
    The Aesthetic Ground (part...
    From Allbeit
    Language that has no words
    Recently commented on
    From CoCreatr
    Overview Effect
    From Mariana Soffer
    Mind, cognition,...
    From Mariana Soffer
    Why do people play social...
    From Mariana Soffer
    Buddhist roots and...
    From Mariana Soffer
    Personal Information...
    Mariana Soffer’s projects
    The human species is rapidly and indisputably moving towards the technological singularity. The cadence of the flow of information and innovation in...

    The Total Library
    Text that redefines...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From Mariana Soffer's personal cargo

    Why do people play social games? Why do they pay for social goods?
    Project: Polytopia
    Facebook has 100M people that play every day an average of 30 minutes. This equals to 50,000,000 hours / day, or 1,5B / hours month spent playing games only in this site.

    Why do people play social games?

    • They provide fun outside of their game mechanics. They provide fun via their flexibility and emphasis on customization. FarmVille itself (a social game where the main objective is to take care of a farm doing chores like harvesting plants) is very simple to play. The fun in playing is mainly found in doing things like choosing where to put your barn, how to decorate around your farmhouse and creating an apple orchard in one corner.

    • They make people feel part of a community in which they relate to other people by helping each other with their farms chores, sending each other’s gift, posting messages in the network, competing with each other and allowing others to see the farm built with your own effort, patience and good taste.

    • They require no download or install. They can run on old computers and they are (initially) free.

    Why do people pay for virtual goods?

    A virtual good, it is most commonly thought of as a discrete digital item upon which a player can exert some level of control. Examples include interior design accessories, and machines. They can be functional or purely visual.

    • Desire to accelerate progress: they provide shortcuts to insider knowledge or to skip-to-the-front-of-the-line. As in the real world, we are willing to pay for access or knowledge to get ahead faster. Some of these virtual goods do the same within the environment they are part of a better barn, a boost, or tools to enhance the game play.

    • Competing: you want to beat others, and desire to be the best, thus you purchase virtual items that can clearly help you achieve that goal.

    • Entertainment: this seems to appeal more to females. Shopping (especially if there is a social feedback loop) and/or collecting (mainly when there is an overlay of social cooperation or competition) can be a strong form of entertainment.

    • Self-expression: often related to aesthetic rather than functional virtual goods, is tied to the human desire to show off a sense of style/identity/personality.

    Maybe the truth is based on what Caesar believed 1900 years ago, he said that people need just two things: food and games, meaning physical and virtual goods. Physical goods solve the physical problems of existence, while virtual goods solve mental 'problems' such as curiosity, aesthetic value judgment and boredom.

    Fri, Nov 5, 2010  Permanent link
    Categories: social games virtual goods
    Sent to project: Polytopia
      RSS for this post
      Promote (4)
      Add to favorites
    Create synapse

    Fast T     Sun, Nov 7, 2010  Permanent link
    Mariana, these meet logic fine, yet I would think that in coming to understand these trends one should take into account the aspect of expanding experience as a principle that wins with humanity, no matter the media and concrete activity. Expanding experience, as general as the term is, includes so much of our humaneness, such as art, sciences, entertainment, social engagement, and so on. The technological based virtual life is clearly providing a rich medium upon which we play/test/apply these tendencies. I think the interesting issue is how this medium will affect us in terms of tipping the balance between 'virtual' and so called 'real'.
    Mariana Soffer     Mon, Nov 8, 2010  Permanent link
    Fast T:
    Thanks for thinking I am on the right track. Regarding the balance that you mentioned in the end here is part of a reply to a person who is completelly against virtual words:
    I do not think virtual lives only bring drawbacks. Remember you can get to know marvelous people trough it (we talked about this) that otherwise it would have been impossible. What is important is the balance you should keep in your mind by giving each virtual and real life it's proper place.