Member 2334
3 entries
16327 views

 RSS
Contributor to project:
Polytopia
Cph
Immortal since Oct 3, 2009
Uplinks: 0, Generation 3

_ q u i c k f o l i o
my Twitter
my Buzz
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Tomas’ favorites
    From Wildcat
    The Future History of...
    From Wildcat
    Polytopia as Rhizomatic...
    From Ilparone
    The rise of the...
    From Venessa
    What is Social Media? [the...
    From Wildcat
    A Topos in a Polytopia...
    Tomas’ project
    Polytopia
    The human species is rapidly and indisputably moving towards the technological singularity. The cadence of the flow of information and innovation in...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From Tomas's personal cargo

    On Deleuze's Ontology
    Project: Polytopia
    “A philosopher’s ontology is the set of entities he or she assumes to exist in reality, the types of entities he or she is committed to assert actually exist. Although in the history of philosophy there are a great variety of ontological commitments, we can very roughly classify these into three main groups. For some philosophers reality has no existence independently from the human mind that perceives it, so their ontology consists mostly of mental entities, whether these are thought as transcendent objects or, on the contrary, as linguistic representations or social conventions. Other philosophers grant to the objects of everyday experience a mind independent existence, but remain unconvinced that theoretical entities, whether unobservable relations such as physical causes, or unobservable entities such as electrons, possess such an ontological autonomy. Finally, there are philosophers who grant reality full autonomy from the human mind, disregarding the difference between the observable and the unobservable and the anthropocentrism this distinction implies. These philosophers are said to have a realist ontology. Deleuze is such a realist philosopher, a fact that by itself should distinguish him from most post-modern philosophies which remain basically non-realist.

    Realist philosophers, on the other hand, need not agree about the contents of this mind-independent reality. In particular, Deleuze rejects several of the entities taken for granted in ordinary forms of realism . To take the most obvious example, in some realist approaches the world is thought to be composed of fully formed objects whose identity is guaranteed by their possession of an essence, a core set of properties that defines what these objects are. Deleuze is not a realist about essences, or any other transcendent entity, so in his philosophy something else is needed to explain what gives objects their identity and what preserves this identity through time. Briefly, this something else is dynamical processes. Some of these processes are material and energetic, some are not, but even the latter remain immanent to the world of matter and energy. Thus, Deleuze’s process ontology breaks with the essentialism that characterizes naive realism and, simultaneously. removes one of the main objections that non-realists make against the postulation of an autonomous reality.”

    (Manuel DeLanda: IS&VP pp. 2-3)

    Mon, Oct 5, 2009  Permanent link

    Sent to project: Polytopia
      RSS for this post
    1 comment
      Promote (4)
      
      Add to favorites (1)
    Create synapse
     
    Comments:


    HelloAlexCL     Thu, Oct 8, 2009  Permanent link
    The idea of a dynamical processes, or just processes in general, is itself a refutation of essentialism. Mahāyāna Buddhism refutes essentialism by similar means, namely through the concept of emptiness, or interdependence, which is itself subject to emptiness ("emptiness" is also empty, interdependent). The idea of process in Deleuze's thought, specifically the process of something becoming something that it is not and does not resemble, demonstrates emptiness. In meditation (generally in the Tibetan school) the meditator is told to observe the flow of mind, the process of thought, without accepting or rejecting what is observed. The meditator might be asked to focus on the "gaps," between thoughts, which are like nothing. He can only identify them retrospectively in noticing a thought occurring that does not resemble the previous thought. These gaps are a nothing which nothing can fill. The realization of the nature of these gaps is about as far as one can go in observing perception in meditation, which is considered a “subtle grasping.” In this meditation, emptiness is understood as process. We can see the idea of process in the word choice "flow of mind." The process itself, whether you want to call it dynamical process or flow of mind, is what gives the "object" its ontological status, or illusion of independent existence. Most importantly, the idea of process eliminates the need to refute an autonomous reality, because this process of experience/mind is the reality. And it cannot even be objectified as such. The “things” transformed in the process take on the appearance of "things" only through the process.
     
          Cancel