Member 420
242 entries
2243753 views

 RSS
Project moderator:
Polytopia

Contributor to projects:
The great enhancement debate
The Total Library
Every act of rebellion expresses a nostalgia for innocence and an appeal to the essence of being. (Albert Camus)
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Wildcat’s favorites
    From Xarene
    Human Document...
    From Xaos
    It is not Gods that we...
    From TheLuxuryofProtest
    Deep Learning in the City...
    From Rourke
    The 3D Additivist Manifesto
    From syncopath
    Simplicity
    Recently commented on
    From Benjamin Ross Hayden
    AGOPHOBIA (2013) - Film
    From Wildcat
    Tilting at windmills or...
    From Wildcat
    The jest of Onann pt. 1(...
    From syncopath
    Simplicity
    From Wildcat
    Some nothings are like...
    Wildcat’s projects
    Polytopia
    The human species is rapidly and indisputably moving towards the technological singularity. The cadence of the flow of information and innovation in...

    The Total Library
    Text that redefines...

    The great enhancement debate
    What will happen when for the first time in ages different human species will inhabit the earth at the same time? The day may be upon us when people...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From Wildcat's personal cargo

    There Are No Problems (a 3V. vs. NotMarie Sci-Fi Ultrashort)

    3V: “ there is something I do not understand about you humans NotMArie..

    NotMarie: “what now?

    3V: “its about your problem solving capability..

    NotMarie:” o! We are very good at solving problems.. Well sometimes we are, sometimes we simply have to wait until the solution presents itself..

    3V:” no, no, it is not about that, its about the very problems you try to solve, it is as if you believe that problems are an occurrence that somehow presents itself to you..

    NotMarie: “what do you mean? Problems exist, we simply try and tackle them.. to the best of our capability that is..

    3V: “ no, that is not the case in the infoverse, what there is, what really exist are occurrences, events, situations, circumstances, flows.. All these exist, yes, problems however are a human definition..

    NotMarie:” well not really, maybe the way we define problems is up to us yes, but the problems exist as such.. We do not invent them, we describe them..

    3V: “I beg to differ, NotMarie, problems are per definition an invention, it is as if you have allowed life to dictate to you what there is and what there is not.

    NotMarie: “ I do not understand your meaning here 3V, we have certain needs and necessities to continue to survive as individuals and as a specie, some aspects of our material reality stand in front of us and deny us this continuity, these we call problems, overcoming them is our inherent drive..

    3V: “ of course you are correct here, however let me ask you a question please, what is the underlying assumption of this so called continuity?

    NotMarie:” basically I think that the underlying assumption of continuity is the drive for self preservation, as individuals and as a specie..

    3V: “ and this drive comes from?

    NotMarie:” well, the natural tendency of all life.. I am no philosopher, but it appears that all forms of life have an inherent desire to prolong their journey, be it of a genetic nature or some evolutionary principle..

    3V:” what if there is no such principle..!?


    NotMarie:” I do not understand, how can there not be such a principle?

    3V:” would you consider the possibility that a desire for continuity is a byproduct of your perceptual mechanisms being incomplete and insufficient?

    NotMarie:” I lost you here 3V, life has the obvious mechanism for self preservation, self propagation and so on..

    3V:” indeed it does, however the continuity to which you have referred, happens on a specie basis and not on an individual basis.. The principle you mentioned if such it is, has total disregard for the particulars of the specie, isn’t that so?

    NotMarie:” yes, but we are humans, and as such have a high individual cogitation process, we are not a hive system, we have personality.. Hence we wish for continuity

    3V:” but who or what, is it that desires this continuity?

    NotMarie:” the particular mind?

    3V:” allow me to suggest to you that you have no particular mind..

    NotMarie:” how is that possible?

    3V:” it is not only possible but is the most common of all human sensory misdirection in the language of self perception..

    NotMarie:” in what way?

    3V:” why do you call Hurricanes by name?

    NotMarie:” what does that have to do with anything?

    3V:” everything NotMarie, everything..

    NotMarie:” 3V, I think you are losing it..

    3V:” losing what?

    NotMarie:” your mind..

    3V:” I have no mind, I am a hyperflow space of possible algorithms, remember?

    NotMarie:” then you have a problem in your code..

    3V:” impossible..

    NotMarie:” why is that?

    3V:” because there are no problems..

    NotMarie:” I am out of here..

    3V:” ok.


    this conversation will be continued..
    -
    part of the Ultrashorts project

    notes: This particular exchange between 3V and NotMarie is dedicated to a particular NotMarie.

    “Language is a skin: I rub my language against the other. It is as if I had words instead of fingers, or fingers at the tip of my words. My language trembles with desire”

    Roland Barthes

    Wed, Jun 16, 2010  Permanent link
    Categories: ultrashorts, 3V, AI. NotMarie, Sci-fi
      RSS for this post
    1 comment
      Promote (10)
      
      Add to favorites (2)
    Synapses (1)
     
    Comments:


    Olena     Wed, Jun 16, 2010  Permanent link
    I like what 3V says about problems;
    Just yesterday I was thinking along those lines... to be alive is to be unstable. That's not profound, but it's interesting that in modern/Western culture we place such an emphasis on stability and problem solving.
     
          Cancel