Member 518
9 entries
8181 views

 RSS
(M)
Rochester, NY, US
Immortal since Dec 12, 2007
Uplinks: 0, Generation 2
Sometimes there is only what happens when you are silent. Fisherman, writer/thinker, dad.
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Recently commented on
    From awindow
    Fuck 'Exploring Inner...
    From feanne
    killing wildflowers
    From pacocamino
    When Particles Collide
    From
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From fishingpoet's personal cargo

    Getting dirt under our fingernails
    The state of our species...

    I wonder, in the end, what statement is being made, or difference forged, or truth realized through the collective intelligence, insight, creativity and hypothesizing happening here. Are we preaching to the choir? Are we simply sharing in sympathetic circles? Is our commentary inherently exclusive?

    Recent conversation around the quality/relevance/value of the information being added to the body of work that is Space Collective asks and tries to answer the question. The intensity and focus of initial posts vs. what seems to be fatigue as the months lumber on. What does immediate, mass dissemination of this information accomplish? What does it say about us as a culture...species? There's talk of malaise and disenchantment. There's the wholehearted, if only virtual, interest and exploration into the capacity/potential/value of a society that exists solely online.

    Humankind exists in billions of small universes... each with the potential to overlap... concentric circles from pebbles dropped on opposite sides of a calm pond. When I mentioned sympathetic circles above, I wasn't necessarily speaking of like-mindedness in individual opinion/attitude/experience, but rather like-mindedness in the fact that there is a collective comfort and confidence in the sharing of those opinions/attitudes/experiences in an online setting.

    The phenomenon of electronic culture is growing and garnering more and more clout as a viable and arguably vital part of our society/culture (I'm old enough to remember when typing classes were a requirement in school and half the class still had to use traditional typewriters). But what about face-to-face discourse? What about the marches and demonstrations from our not-so-distant past? The collective and most often undeniable voice of flesh and blood? Is it enough to simply record our opinions/attitudes/experiences here? To make them available to an audience (in reality, a thoughtful minority) for study and debate that stays-put in an exclusive medium (after all, invites are extended to those we feel would add to the conversation..we knowingly,or unknowingly, protect our space)? At what point does our intelligent and socially and culturally (and even politically) valuable discourse turn to involve/influence the leadership and policy of the real world (I'll point to the TED conference)? Is there a bigger picture? Will we ultimately leverage our applied thought to bring about social or environmental change? Will we illuminate the dire situation of millions suffering human rights injustices? Will we help to simply open peoples eyes to a greater and more dynamic appreciation of creativity?

    This may very well not be the platform for any of these things. And that's absolutely fine. But if we believe enough in our own merit to publish our thoughts for the world to see...and to challenge those of others respectfully, intelligently and with great passion...if we believe in change, in the idea that an individual voice can be heard on a global stage... there is a need...a requirement...to get dirt under one's fingernails (as I have been discussing with awindow recently), a need for intention and intelligence to defined art (or even this historical electronic record) as "true." What truth are we looking to put forth about our species and its state here? Is it enough to simply define it?

    Wed, Apr 9, 2008  Permanent link

      RSS for this post
    1 comment
      Promote (2)
      
      Add to favorites (1)
    Synapses (1)
     
    Comments:


    awindow     Wed, Apr 9, 2008  Permanent link
    Well put! At the very least the dissemination of the ideas tossed about here, could lead to new paths, and approaches in peoples personal projects. Also an element of collaboration and co-operation could emerge (and has, in the various projects) bringing added depth and impact to individual experiments. There is even potential for these projects to expand beyond these boundaries further into the 'real world', and into greater consciousness.

    In speaking of the value of information, for my part I was speaking of the internet generally. Not necessarily Space Collective. Not everything can be amazing all the time...but I think in alot of ways this place is the exception rather than the rule. We can only endevour to increase our own own output in quality and purpose, and together build increasingly meaningful universes. This is never easy.

    I had collected some material randomly from various places on the internet, to illustrate the shadow side that we were discussing in a post. But I think in moving forward focusing on the negative in other places may not serve a purpose, and maybe that it's a post better left in the dust bin.
     
          Cancel