Member 1457
14 entries
99094 views

 RSS
Roland
Milan/Tokyo, IT
Immortal since Jan 11, 2008
Uplinks: 0, Generation 3

9pp.co
R____d on twitter
Nine_Pages on twitter
Untangling
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Robokku’s favorites
    From Wildcat
    Guess what?
    From marianne
    hétérotopies -...
    From carel
    Stuck in the Neolithic
    From Rourke
    In Another city another me...
    From Wildcat
    Mind Habitat, the quest...
    Recently commented on
    From Robokku
    The informational realm -...
    From Spaceweaver
    The Singularity University...
    From Robokku
    The thing modelled
    From notthisbody
    Love & Death in Cyberspace
    From folkert
    Form follows data
    Robokku’s projects
    Polytopia
    The human species is rapidly and indisputably moving towards the technological singularity. The cadence of the flow of information and innovation in...

    The Total Library
    Text that redefines...

    The great enhancement debate
    What will happen when for the first time in ages different human species will inhabit the earth at the same time? The day may be upon us when people...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    This is a short book. Sounds good when I put it like that, doesn't it? However, much as its plot covers a short space of time, but is deceptively epic, the 100 or so pages are deceptively dense.


    Don't want to read all this? See it condensed in the comments of For the wannabe bookworm!

    I present four short items to introduce this novel to you. The first is the following short paragraph which should show what has lead me to recommend it.

    The Mezzanine approaches the intricacies of the everyday in such a way that its philosophical themes may be brought to mind as you go about your daily business long after you have read it. Perhaps forever. I don't know. So far, I have been going about six months, and still can't tie my shoelaces irreflectively. On the other hand, as will become clear shortly, it may offer you nothing at all. (If you have no soul!)

    The second and third items I present are the following two published responses to the novel, which I think are particularly informative when taken together.
    Faintly amusing for about ten pages then increasingly, numbingly dull: the moment-by-moment thoughts of a 25-ish office worker during his lunch hour—with an unabashed, verbose focus on the most trivial, everyday activities. The narrator's molasses-like stream-of-consciousness begins with the half-pint of milk he is carrying—which leads to a two-page footnote on the differences between paper straws and plastic straws. (Similarly ungainly asides are strewn throughout). The lunchtime purchase of shoelaces triggers meditations on broken laces, CVS stores, and socks. Soon there are memories of childhood shoe-typing—and other "major advances" in life: the day the narrator discovered that sweeping was fun; the day he ordered a rubber return-address stamp; and the day his "life as an adult" began, when, at 23, he figured out how to put on deodorant after being fully dressed. Then, when he rides an escalator, two chapters of escalator thoughts ensue, as the narration reaches new peaks of self-consciousness. ("So I want now to do two things: to set the escalator to the mezzaine against a clean mental background as something fine and worth my adult time to think about, and to state that while I did draw some large percentage of joy from the continuities that the adult escalator ride established with childhood escalators, I will try not to glide by on the reminiscential tone. . .") And there are also musings on ice-cube trays, Jiffy Pops, earplugs, vending machines, Marcus Aurelius, Disney cartoons, Penguin paperbacks, and—with a welcome bit of ribald energy—corporate bathrooms. (The narrator overcomes public-urinal embarrassment by "pretending to urinate on the other person's head.")

    (From Kirkus Reviews - first review on Google Books)

    And the other:
    Everyone who read Nicholson Baker's marvelous first novel, ''The Mezzanine,'' wondered what he could possibly do for an encore. Packed with fascinatingly digressive footnotes on everything from the shape of staplers to the buoyancy of straws, ''The Mezzanine'' was a brief, Swiftian, Proustian tale about a seemingly unremarkable lunch hour in the life of a big-city office worker, as well as an impressively precise commentary on the nature of memory, the esthetics of industrial design, the boredom of white-collar work and the sources of life's small, sustaining pleasures. It was a whole book seemingly made up of the best parts of Updike, those moments of acutely described visceral perception that remind us what it's like to live in late-20th-centuryJU America.

    (From the New York Times - fourth review on Google Books)

    My final point of reference for you is my own mentions of The Mezzanine in a post I just wrote.
    I was a little disappointed to discover, in conversation with Dad, that our thing-in-common was not as in-common as I had thought. For instance, he had never read a favourite section of mine. It was the two-page footnote imagining microscopic explorers investigating up-close the histories of erosion of the grooves in records, and then comparing them to the findings from a different miniaturised expedition into the grooves left behind in ice by skates. He had not read it, he said, because his attention had been too strongly bound by the relaying, in another two-page footnote, of stapler designers' decades-long, slavish following of locomotive form factors, which they reproduced in functional officeware precisely and consistently twenty years behind the fashions of the trainyard. (That is to say that 1960s staplers are shaped like 1940s trains, and 1970s staplers are shaped like 1950s trains, and so on.)

    (From my Nicholson Baker on Wikipedia)


    I hope the above bits serve as a nice introduction to a wonderful novel which is easily as enlightening as you allow it to be. Strangely, I think its appeal is best captured by the first review I showed. If the author of that review thought he had pinpointed the failings of The Mezzanine, then there is surely no way to turn him around on the matter.

    See also my super-abridgment in For the wannabe bookworm in The Total Library.
    Thu, Apr 10, 2008  Permanent link
    Categories: Books, Nicholson Baker
    Sent to project: The Total Library
      RSS for this post
      Promote (1)
      
      Add to favorites
    Synapses (1)
     

    I got the Guardian today, but my eyes didn't even reach the fold. They didn't even reach the date. The top corner advertises page 4 of G2, the comment and features section:
    Nicholson Baker
    Wikipedia took over my life

    Thrill. This paper was supposed just to be something to prop my gaze against while the sandwich went in. Now I was actually set up for an enjoyable lunchtime. A good surprise. I called my dad.

    To me, Nicholson Baker was a man who wrote a short novel, quirkily interesting, in the 1980s, then disappeared into obscurity. I thought that of him because a little while ago I read The Mezzanine. It was a novel. It was short. I found it quirkily interesting. The cover was classically 1980s-styled. When I finished it, I heard nothing more of Nicholson Baker. I had not heard of him before I read it either. So I pictured him as having disappeared into obscurity by, say, 1986, leaving behind a wacky story of shoelaces, milk cartons, and the great paper vs. plastic drinking straw debate.

    I read The Mezzanine on my dad's recommendation. He is in product design. An academic. I could see why he'd been pushing it on his students, probably since the 80s. I loved the book. It is a recent thing-in-common between us, so I called him now, sandwich still sticker-sealed. He shared my thrill. Nicholson Baker? Wikipedia? Well... He would set out to buy the Guardian right away, he said. However, I was a little disappointed to discover, in conversation with Dad, that our thing-in-common was not as in-common as I had thought. For instance, he had never read a favourite section of mine. It was the two-page footnote imagining microscopic explorers investigating up-close the histories of erosion of the grooves in records, and then comparing them to the findings from a different miniaturised expedition into the grooves left behind in ice by skates. He had not read it, he said, because his attention had been too strongly bound by the relaying, in another two-page footnote, of stapler designers' decades-long, slavish following of locomotive form factors, which they reproduced in functional officeware precisely and consistently twenty years behind the fashions of the trainyard. (That is to say that 1960s staplers are shaped like 1940s trains, and 1970s staplers are shaped like 1950s trains, and so on.) In short, he hadn't actually read the whole book. But he could see its appeal, and so could I. Strangely, I think the following review sums up my affection for it.

    Faintly amusing for about ten pages then increasingly, numbingly dull: the moment-by-moment thoughts of a 25-ish office worker during his lunch hour—with an unabashed, verbose focus on the most trivial, everyday activities.

    (From the first review showing on Google Books)


    So I hope you can understand my anticipation as I thumbed for the G2, phone now on hook, sandwich bag open: The Mezzanine addressed only the whole world, Wikipedia is a much bigger subject. I was ready for the minutiae of the massive, the intricacies of the infinite.

    The article was charming. Dressed up like a Wikipedia entry, with blue hyperlinked footnotes, which made for a passable gag in pulpy newsprint. I took that first impression back to the office, eating on the move. Having chatted with dad, I didn't have time to read the article until later.



    Naturally, I sneaked in some research whilst at the desk, alt-tabbing discreetly between Excel and Wikipedia's Baker entry for some indulgent scene-setting. I read his publications list. Sure enough, The Mezzanine appeared in the 80s, but, contrary to my egocentric version of events, it was the beginning of a string of notable novels and non-fictions, occasionally cheering critics and perturbing best-seller lists. Included were:

    Vox (1992)
    A phone-sex taboo-toucher (strangely described in the wiki as "disappointingly unpornographic").

    Check-in (2004)
    A story concerning a psychotic-sounding fellow who plots the assassination of George W by unworkably stupid means, but principally concerning his conversation with a friend about his arrival at such plans.

    U and I: Tall Tales (1998)
    Non-fiction. This one inspired me because it apparently involves an investigation and analysis of John Updike's works, written without reading those works at all at any point after the commencement of the project. This caught my imagination so much that I have written this post in exactly that way. As a result, this list and my earlier references to The Mezzanine are certainly inaccurate. (In particular, these book titles escape me now, so I have fabricated them.)

    Decimo: Book destruction in US libraries 1972-1986 (2001)
    Non-fiction. This one brought to mind some thoughts of Rene's, in a post I read yesterday. He was wondering about the impact of the openness and accessibility of information on printed books and our attitudes towards them. (Sorry, Rene, if you read this: I've not reread your post either, so I may misrepresent you.) In Decimo, Baker actually traced the histories of print publications abandoned by librarians and tagged for destruction in the microfiching frenzy of the 70s and 80s. (Apparently there was a microfiching frenzy in the 70s and 80s.)


    I was sure then, in light of those last two books on the list, that Nicholson Baker was a man with a high regard for subjective impressions of things (Tall Tales) and a love for the history and future of information collation (Decimo). He was a man whose reaction to Wikipedia I wanted to witness. By five, I knew this G2 article was going to be a treat. I stacked the day's spread of paperwork at one side of the desk, took the supplement from my bag and laid it in the space. Then I changed my mind. I would read it at home, savour it. I bagged it again and put on my coat, clipped my trousers for the cycle.

    Actually, no. My mind was perfectly primed, I thought. This was the moment to read it. I sat at my desk again, still coated and clipped, fished out the paper and flicked to page 4. I had been right at lunchtime: the Wikipedian stylings really were charming. I read the title and lead-in again - I had got that far before. Then it occurred to me that my readiness to enjoy this article had only increased since lunchtime. The anticipation was sort of stewing, the flavours of expectation spreading and intensifying, I thought, which image made me realise I was hungry. I would read it at home. Then I could eat first: might as well add the satisfaction of a full stomach. Besides, my research had so effectively confirmed the high probability that the article would be utterly gripping, that I could actually plot a related post for Space Collective on the cycle home. Decided. I repacked and left.

    Bike locked; house clothes on; work clothes pressed; feeding accomplished; feet up. The thrill of knowing I was going to read a good article; the bliss of a happily distracted digestive system. That is what it's all about. That would be the high point of the day. The truth was, I decided, I didn't even need to read the article.

    So I didn't.

    If you want to, it's here.
      Promote
      
      Add to favorites (4)
    Synapses (2)
     


    I am a bad reader. Slow, ill-disciplined, with a wandering mind.

    I will rarely manage a whole book.

    I will rarely manage a whole review of a book.

    For those out there like me - and for me - will you please imply your endorsement of a book in the following format?

    1. Two-sentence summary —> 2. One-sentence summary —> 3. One-word summary

    I'll start, with Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico Philosophicus:

    • "If we were to talk about the relation between language and the world - as philosophers would like to - we would have to step outside of language, and so would not be able to talk. So the propositions of philiosophy, this book included, are nonsense."

    • "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."

    • "Shhh!"
    Mon, Apr 7, 2008  Permanent link
    Categories: Books, narrative, Nicholson Baker, Wittgenstein
    Sent to project: The Total Library
      RSS for this post
      Promote (4)
      
      Add to favorites (3)
    Create synapse
     
          Cancel