Member 2247
3 entries

Contributor to project:
Jascha Rohr (M)
Huntlosen, DE
Immortal since May 28, 2009
Uplinks: 0, Generation 3

Institute Participatory Design
Blog IPG
  • Affiliated
  •  /  
  • Invited
  •  /  
  • Descended
  • Recently commented on
    From notthisbody
    You are a Receiver
    From jascharohr
    New organizations and...
    jascharohr’s project
    The human species is rapidly and indisputably moving towards the technological singularity. The cadence of the flow of information and innovation in...
    Now playing SpaceCollective
    Where forward thinking terrestrials share ideas and information about the state of the species, their planet and the universe, living the lives of science fiction. Introduction
    Featuring Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames, based on an idea by Kees Boeke.
    From jascharohr's personal cargo

    New organizations and leadership through Participatory Design
    Project: Polytopia
    The idea that change is a transitional phase between two stable states is ridiculed by everyday experiences in our globalized world. Constant change is the actual state of our living world. We should seek to comprehend, incorporate and develop that which makes life worth living through change, not against it. One way of doing this is by participatory design. Participatory design will change the way we think about leadership and organizational structures and is based on certain attitudes and methodological approaches which in part we already know and in part we still have to develop. The results of participatory design are not set products or structures but living processes in themselves and therefore represent sustainable change.

    In my work for various organizations, networks and businesses promoting social and ecological change, I see the main obstacle to our aspirations not in the fields of resources or information, though these too need careful consideration. I see the main obstacle in the design of our organizational structures and in the way we act individually and collectively within them. Our own consciousness lies at the core of developing new habits, attitudes, methods, processes, actions and organizational designs.

    I define consciousness in a very profound way as our ability to exercise a reflective awareness for ourselves in our own contexts. Generally spoken, I see two major approaches to consciousness in organizations today: they are either based on roles, hierarchies, authoritative direction, and linear planning (e.g. many companies, public authorities and political institutions) or by values, equality, and joint decision making (e.g. many civil society institutions, social and ecological enterprises and small company networks). Both approaches meet certain economic, social and ecological requirements and both have their crucial drawbacks. I consider both of them insufficient to meet the challenges of the 21st century. This is why my work focuses on the development of a third approach which is based on participatory design and collaborative co-creation with the aim to foster individual and collective potential in order to create emergent solutions.

    I have worked with participatory design processes over the last 9 years in landscape architecture, businesses, civil society and ecological organizations. At the core of participatory design lies the understanding that sustainable solutions have to be found on the basis of context, environment and process and not on the basis of predetermined goals. They are based in local practice and shaped by the interconnectedness with given social, ecological and economical frameworks rather than single ideas rolled out globally. It is also acknowledged that participatory design incorporates the designers in the design: while we change the world around us, we change ourselves as well. Personal, local and global change are interlinked. Participatory design thus becomes a co-creative and generative process which is alive in itself. It creates emergence, produces contextual awareness, new ideas, collective intelligence and often unexpected solutions.

    So how do we turn into organizations which employ the third approach?

    1. We have to create diverse face-to-face opportunities to experience and reflect upon local participatory design processes so that individual and collective consciousness towards these processes can develop. This can be done through programs in education, business and civil society. For those programs to succeed it will be important that methodologies can be devised in accordance with the respective local context and that results are judged on the basis of the process rather than on initial goals or requirements.

    2. We have to encourage self-empowerment, exploration of individual and collective potential and truthful, conscious leadership, the willingness to thoroughly engage with the topics at hand so that personal processes become intertwined with the design process and the willingness to see crises and challenges as opportunities to transcend old agendas and behavioral patterns. This is fostered by participatory design process which are lead by professional and experienced facilitators.

    3. We have to exchange personal and local experiences at a global level, so as not to copy solutions into alien contexts but to understand the patterns of change, creation and the emergence of collective intelligence globally. This can be achieved with the aid of new collaboration technologies which are already under development and testing.

    Through these measures we will dive into a global participatory design process which will lead to a succession towards new organizational structures and a new understanding of leadership as a service to our collective potential and consciousness.

    Mon, Jun 8, 2009  Permanent link

    Sent to project: Polytopia
      RSS for this post
      Promote (5)
      Add to favorites (1)
    Create synapse

    Spaceweaver     Mon, Jun 8, 2009  Permanent link
    Thanks for the interesting post. The concept of participatory design driven by conscious reflection sounds very interesting. Would be glad if you can provide an example for such a process, even as a thought experiment, to allow a better grasp on your ideas.
    jascharohr     Tue, Jun 9, 2009  Permanent link
    Hi Spaceweaver,
    I will soon write more about it. Participatory design processes are not that diffrent from what you might know from facilitation, change or large group methods. It is anyway not so important what you do, but rather how you do it and what inner attitudes you take on.
    A participatory design process how we facilitate it always starts with connecting to the field of what is to be designed. You do this with appropriate methods both individually and in the same group. Those methods have to be chosen in a process of its own, so that you get an iterative and interchanged process. You want to weave a tight net between everyone and -thing which has part of this field. Out of this you are then able to design. We think of design as morphing the field of which you are part and not as creating something which is apart from you.
    But rather then writing about it, this is something which has to experienced in reality to grasp the impact fully. So I think I will give notice when we facilitate open processes here and on our institutes website.
    Wildcat     Sat, Jun 13, 2009  Permanent link
    "I define consciousness in a very profound way as our ability to exercise a reflective awareness for ourselves in our own contexts"

    Jascha, I would be very interested to read an elaboration on this definition.
    some questions :
    do you understand consciousness to be an ability?

    "reflective awareness" is a very complex term, however, in the construct of your definition I do not understand in what way is it "for ourselves", and in "our own contexts". isn't that a form of solipsism, maybe in a weak version?

    AsylumSeaker     Tue, Jun 23, 2009  Permanent link
    Interesting. I like what you've written though I don't have a very clear picture from it. I guess it's quite a summary of your ideas most likely.

    For a while I've been mulling over the idea of a system where people are encouraged to and rewarded for actively seeking / creating new roles in an organisation which compliment existing roles, rather than squabbling and competing for existing roles in a hierarchy. A lot of what you've expressed here suggests this sort of thing perhaps?
    modernCarpentry     Wed, Jun 24, 2009  Permanent link
    your post is very engaging, and I've spent some time thinking about it. while I am among those who wish that a collective intelligence can overcome our existing media-sphere, while I wish that together we are more able to create design than on our own, I still have a feeling that the most engaging ideas and entertainments, the most compelling advertisements, etc, are the result of a single mind ( of course in collaboration with others ) but none-the-less a single mind executing its ideas on our media space. just a passing idea-