When you say "you got it all wrong" means both first that you did not understand anything at all ["all wrong"] and second that you misunderstood the thing to be communicated ["you got it"]. Which logically would result in a cumulated frustration from both outcomes and this would be the worse scenario. Logically. But what if we take this statement from a nonlogical approach, when you say "you got it" this means you had a receptor, someone who not just listened to what you had to say but also tried to extract meaning from it but failed entirely ["got it all wrong"].
We are dealing with facts so far which seams to be at separate poles. On one side logical 2xFrustration msg failed to be transmitted + msg failed to be understood, on the opposite side we deal with a human being willing to communicate. Would you mind if I tell you... You got it all wrong ?

We are dealing with facts so far which seams to be at separate poles. On one side logical 2xFrustration msg failed to be transmitted + msg failed to be understood, on the opposite side we deal with a human being willing to communicate. Would you mind if I tell you... You got it all wrong ?






